Arbitration Clauses: A Contract Within a Contract
Most business owners treat arbitration clauses as boilerplate — something to paste in at the end of a contract without much thought. That is a mistake. An arbitration clause is not just a provision; it is a self-contained legal framework that determines how every future dispute between the parties will be resolved. It is, in the language of arbitration law, a contract within a contract.
The Separability Doctrine: Why the Arbitration Clause Stands Alone
Under the separability doctrine — established by the U.S. Supreme Court and applied in both New Jersey and New York — an arbitration clause is treated as legally independent from the contract in which it appears. This has significant practical consequences. Even if a party argues that the underlying contract is void, fraudulent, or unenforceable, that argument generally does not automatically invalidate the arbitration clause. The validity of the arbitration agreement itself is a separate question, typically decided by the arbitrator rather than a court.
This means that a poorly drafted arbitration clause can bind you to a process you never intended — even in a dispute where you are challenging the contract itself.
What an Arbitration Clause Can (and Should) Address
A well-tailored arbitration clause is not a one-size-fits-all provision. It can be customized across several dimensions:
Which disputes are covered. An arbitration clause can be broad — covering all disputes arising out of or relating to the agreement — or narrow, carving out certain categories (injunctive relief, IP disputes, collections under a threshold) for litigation. The scope matters enormously, and vague language creates ambiguity that courts and arbitrators have to resolve.
Which rules govern. Most commercial arbitration clauses specify a set of administering rules. The American Arbitration Association (AAA) Commercial Arbitration Rules are among the most widely used. The AAA also provides a standard arbitration clause on its website that you can adapt. Other options include JAMS rules (often used in larger disputes), ICC rules (common in international contracts), or ad hoc arbitration without an administering institution. Each has different fee structures, procedural requirements, and timelines.
Dispute size thresholds. Arbitration can be expensive for small disputes — filing fees alone can exceed the amount in controversy. A well-drafted clause can tier the process: small claims below a threshold might go to a single arbitrator on written submissions only, while larger disputes trigger a full hearing. The AAA has streamlined rules specifically for smaller commercial disputes.
Written submissions vs. live hearings. Not every dispute needs a hearing. For document-intensive commercial disputes, a clause providing for arbitration on written submissions — briefs, declarations, and exhibits without live testimony — can dramatically reduce cost and time. This should be a deliberate choice, not an afterthought.
Confidentiality. Arbitration is private, but privacy is not automatic. A well-drafted clause should expressly require that the existence of the arbitration, all submissions, and the award remain confidential. This protects both parties from the reputational and commercial risks of public litigation.
Seat of arbitration. The seat — the legal place of arbitration — determines which jurisdiction’s procedural law governs the process and which courts have supervisory jurisdiction. For New Jersey and New York businesses, specifying a seat in New Jersey or New York keeps the process local and familiar. In contracts with international counterparties, seat selection is especially significant.
Number of arbitrators. A single arbitrator is faster and less expensive. A three-arbitrator panel provides more deliberation and reduces the risk of an outlier decision, but adds cost and time. The right answer depends on the size and complexity of the disputes you anticipate.
Fee allocation. Who pays the arbitrator’s fees? The default under most rules is that the costs are shared, but the clause can shift fees to the losing party or to the party that initiated a frivolous claim. Fee-shifting provisions can be a powerful deterrent against bad-faith disputes.
The Copy-Paste Problem
Many arbitration clauses in commercial contracts are copied from a prior agreement, pulled from the internet, or taken from an AAA template without modification. This is not always wrong — a standard AAA clause is a reasonable starting point. But it is only a starting point. The clause that worked for a software licensing agreement may be entirely inappropriate for a commercial real estate contract, a staffing agency agreement, or a business purchase transaction. The size of the disputes, the nature of the relationship, the sophistication of the parties, and the governing law all bear on what the clause should say.
At Russo Law LLC, we draft and negotiate arbitration clauses as part of the broader contract drafting process, and we handle arbitration proceedings under AAA and other rules for business clients in New Jersey and New York. If you have questions about an existing arbitration clause or need one drafted for an upcoming agreement, contact us to discuss your situation.
Disclaimer
The legal and business issues discussed in this post vary depending on the specific facts and circumstances of each situation. The legal and business issues discussed in this post vary depending on the specific facts and circumstances of each situation. This corporate lawyer blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It is not an offer for Russo Law LLC to represent any party, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. No action or inaction should be taken based on the information provided without seeking professional legal counsel. This post is intended for businesses in New York and New Jersey. It may not reflect laws in other jurisdictions.
This blog post is attorney advertising. While efforts are made to ensure the accuracy and usefulness of the information, Russo Law LLC makes no representations, warranties, or guarantees, express or implied. This includes no guarantees about its accuracy, completeness, or applicability. It also encompasses any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Laws and regulations change often. Russo Law LLC is not responsible for updating this blog post to show subsequent legal developments.
Russo Law LLC assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the use of any information, materials, products, or processes mentioned in this post. It does not guarantee that reliance on this information will result in any particular outcome. Prior results do not guarantee a similar result. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only. Russo Law LLC does not endorse or assume responsibility for the accuracy or content of external sources.
Do not send confidential or sensitive information through this website or in response to this blog post. Unsolicited information does not create an attorney-client relationship and should not be treated as privileged or confidential.
- What Is an Indemnification Clause and Why Does Everyone Fight Over It?
Indemnification clauses are among the most heavily negotiated provisions in any business contract. Here is what they cover and why the details matter in NJ and NY. - How Life Insurance Policies Are Used to Fund Buy-Sell Agreements
Life insurance is one of the most common funding mechanisms for death-triggered buyouts under a buy-sell agreement. Here is how it works and what to consider. - The Seller Is Financing My Acquisition — What Should the Seller Note Say?
Seller financing is a common structure in small business acquisitions. The promissory note and related documents determine your rights if something goes wrong after closing.
[…] excuse the consequences of using it carelessly. Attorneys and business owners with questions about dispute resolution clauses or business litigation matters are welcome to schedule a consultation with Russo Law […]